PLANES NO LONGER land in Kai Tak, Hong Kong’s outdated airport. However nostalgists can stroll alongside the brand new “sky backyard”, an elevated walkway lined with frangipani, myrtle and acacia, that passes above the outdated runway. By scanning a QR code alongside the route, guests can “increase actuality” by superimposing a picture of a touchdown airplane on their selfies. The park is a part of a redevelopment plan that may finally yield a hospital, tax workplace and new houses for tens of hundreds of individuals. On both facet of the walkway, cranes, diggers and welders labour busily to enhance the fact of Hong Kong’s cramped and dear housing.
Get pleasure from extra audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.
They’ve their work minimize out for them. Property in Hong Kong stays horribly costly, regardless of two years of protests and pandemic. Home costs in April have been just one.5% under their peak in 2019. In a single tower block being inbuilt Kai Tak, a flat of 889 sq. toes bought final month for over HK$30m ($3.9m).
The property market has resisted the pandemic higher than it did the SARS outbreak of 2003, when costs fell by nearly 8%. Certainly, the market has remained tight this time partly due to selections made again then. When SARS struck, home costs had already fallen by greater than 60% since 1997. To curtail provide the federal government resolved to “withdraw from its function of property developer”, vowed to not “promote land at a pathetic worth”, and reported with satisfaction that the availability of latest flats was dwindling. Hong Kong constructed 9 new cities (now residence to nearly half of its inhabitants of seven.5m) between the Nineteen Seventies and the early 2000s. It has not completed any since.
As a substitute the federal government has corralled housebuilding into smaller, piecemeal websites, typically situated in and round present developments. It’s too embarrassed to name them “new cities”, mentioned one speaker at a latest convention hosted by Hong Kong College Enterprise College. It calls them “new growth areas” as an alternative.
With the assistance of such websites, the federal government hopes Hong Kong will add 430,000 flats over the subsequent ten years. That, it reckons, would fulfill rising demand. However these targets are usually over-optimistic: since 2007, housebuilding has undershot them by about 18% in a mean 12 months. If the sample persists, Hong Kong will add solely about 350,000 houses within the subsequent decade.
On this “baseline” state of affairs, housing is prone to develop dearer nonetheless, in keeping with Morgan Stanley. So what would it not take to curb property costs? The financial institution has additionally put collectively what it calls a “bear” state of affairs the place costs fall by a fifth or extra. For that to occur, Hong Kong must add about 730,000 houses over the subsequent ten years, the financial institution calculates, growing the prevailing inventory by nearly 30% (see chart).
That may require encroaching on fields, sea and sky. Hong Kong must construct taller, packing extra flooring house into every web site. It must pace up the conversion of farmland, which may take 15 or extra years. And it must add 235,000 houses on land reclaimed from the ocean. This would come with the federal government’s controversial plan so as to add land to japanese Lantau, Hong Kong’s greatest island, residence to 172,000 folks in addition to white-bellied eagles, Bogadek’s burrowing lizards and finless porpoises, which conservationists argue may very well be threatened by the initiative.
Though it will take years for these efforts to succeed in fruition, a reputable plan may change sentiment—and costs—instantly, factors out Praveen Choudhary of Morgan Stanley. Within the bear state of affairs home costs fall by 20% by the top of 2022. The downward flip would, in different phrases, resemble one of many abrupt landings in Kai Tak that used to make arriving in Hong Kong so thrilling. ■
This text appeared within the Finance & economics part of the print version beneath the headline “Failure to land”